Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
Screenshot 2024-10-02 at 9.11.05 AM
October 2, 2024

Biden’s embrace of Big Labor could be his biggest mistake yet 

Liz Peek Articles

Joe Biden has just made the worst mistake of his presidency, and that’s saying something.  

By not intervening to prevent the walkout by 47,000 East Coast dock workers, the president has singlehandedly increased the odds of an economic downturn, raised the possibility of another round of inflation, soured Kamala Harris’s political prospects and — perhaps most damaging of all to his legacy — probably squashed what had been increasing public enthusiasm for organized labor. 

There’s nothing like running short of Pampers or Legos at Christmastime to infuriate consumers. And there’s nothing like demanding a 77 percent pay hike over six years to make those same consumers turn against the strikers. 

President Biden repeatedly refused in the weeks and days leading up to the International Longshoremen Association’s (ILA) strike to involve himself in the labor dispute. Asked the day before the deadline if he would intervene, Biden demurred, explaining that, “It’s collective bargaining. I don’t believe in Taft-Hartley.”  

Except that it isn’t really collective bargaining when the two sides have not met for months, which was the case with the dockworkers. The Maritime Alliance, the global shippers’ group that employs the longshoremen on the East Coast, was left negotiating with itself, raising its offer of a 40 percent wage increase to 50 percent as the hours ticked down, with the union having spurned the earlier offer as “insulting.” 

Substantially higher pay was not the only issue on the table. The union insists the new contract effectively ban any attempts to automate our ports; reportedly the ILA broke off talks in June when a union official noticed an automatic gate opener operating at a port in Alabama. It was a phony excuse — workers at the port claimed the device had been in operation since the port opened in 2008.  

The demands of the union, many of whose members earn over $200,000 per year with overtime, seem high in the context of 2-3 percent annual inflation. But Joe Biden has encouraged organized labor — his most important political ally — to make outsized demands in recent years, and several unions have been more than happy to do so.  

Biden, who has described himself as the most pro-union president in history, famously “walked the picket line” when the UAW went out on strike last year, pushing them to demand the moon even as automakers were struggling to meet the White House’s injurious electric vehicle mandates. The president told the striking UAW workers, “You deserve a significant raise,” putting his thumb on the scale. He recklessly encouraged the picketers to “stick with it,” and shouted “Yes” when someone asked if the UAW should get an over-the-top 40 percent raise.  

Backed by the president, the UAW won pay hikes of more than 30 percentby the end of April 2028, as well as increased job security; analysts estimated the increased labor expense would cost each of the car companies $1 billion.  

The UAW pressed for higher wages in part by arguing that inflation had hurt their members, and that Detroit had prospered during the pandemic as shortages caused car prices to soar. The ILA is now making the same case; they say they deserve to share in the profits booked by shippers during the supply chain fiasco caused by COVID-19, when the cost of sending a container from Asia to the U.S. went through the roof. And they want wage hikes to pay for cost-of-living increases experienced under Biden-Harris. 

That demand is why, according to a report from Strategas Asset Management, after an initial surge of inflation, there is almost always a “second wave.” Economists at the firm studied “2,100 years of history across 24 countries, [and] … 62 inflationary periods.” In almost 90 percent of the inflation outbreaks, there was a second round of price increases that, on average, came 30 months after the first peak. 

Since U.S. inflation peaked at 9.1 percent in June 2022, 27 months ago, we may be close to experiencing that second wave. The dock strike could bring it on.  

The UAW and the ILA aren’t alone. American Airline pilots, UPS drivers and workers at Kaiser Permanente and Caterpillar have all pressed to be made whole after seeing real incomes fall; all have received big wage gains. Boeing, which has offered a 40 percent pay raise to striking employees, is the latest employer having to pay up, even though that firm has lost billionsin recent years.  

And now the dock workers are making the biggest grab of all. How will these companies pass along the excess costs? By raising prices, which will cause inflation to surge once again.  

Americans will not take kindly to another round of higher prices, and could begin to temper their enthusiasm for Big Labor. Gallup reports that approval of labor unions recently touched 70 percent, a level not seen since the 1960s. If the dock worker strike goes on for long, costing the economy billions of dollars each day, causing widespread product shortages and higher costs, that number is likely to sink like a stone.  

Meanwhile, Vice President Harris will be left holding the bag if Joe Biden’s embrace of Big Labor batters the nation’s economy. The costs of supply disruptions can be severe, as we saw during the pandemic, and especially to popular small businesses. Large firms have been frontloading orders and stockpiling goods in anticipation of a possible strike; small firms do not have the financial wherewithal to do that. 

If and when shortages begin to appear and prices start to climb, voters will hold Harris accountable. All because Joe Biden remains stubbornly in Big Labor’s corner. 

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/4910999-biden-dock-worker-strike

Published in The Hill

Vance vs. Walz debate: Top takeaways from VP candidates’ face-off Trump vs. Harris: The ‘October surprise’ is already here

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

15 hours ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
I am alternately peeved and sympathetic with Chip Roy, Ralph Norman and the others who torpedoed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But after reading the fine print this morning and realizing that reforms to Medicaid don’t kick in until 2029 !!!! I am disgusted. I get that states need some time to adjust to a change in rules regarding Medicaid eligibility – maybe a year or 18 months — but do they really need four years? No, they do not. The extended timeframe is an obvious play to put political repercussions off until after the midterms. Legislators from swing districts fear losing their seats because able-bodied adults lose their free ride. They want to put off any change as long as possible.
On the other hand, those vulnerable legislators will almost certainly get canned if the 2017 tax cuts don’t get extended and Trump’s agenda crashes. We need both to get the bill passed, and to make it tougher.
The conservatives calling for bigger spending cuts are completely correct. Just ask Moody’s, which in recent days downgraded U.S. debt. Imagine, the United States of America has lost its triple-A status. (The other two major ratings agencies had already made this downgrade.) This would be a wake-up call except that most of our country is asleep, lulled into a false sense of complacency by hours spent on Tik-Tok or watching the NFL. We all need downtime, for sure, but we also need to pay attention to what’s happening with our country’s fiscal outlook. It isn’t good. Even the Fed, no friend to the Trump administration or to fiscal austerity, has announced it will cut staff and overhead. Of course, why the Fed has a headcount of 24,000 is a mystery. How can they employ so many people and still get it wrong most of the time? This is the group that never spoke out against Biden’s reckless spending; it’s quite the switch.
Simply put, the country endorsed a huge surge in government spending to compensate for the wrong-headed directives during Covid that shut down schools, businesses and churches. The government under Trump wanted to keep Americans employed and the economy ready to rebound, which it did. Biden kept the spending at max level, refusing to let a crisis go to waste. Democrats in Congress and the Fed went along, spurring the highest inflation in decades.
Now we have to go back to the trend-line pre-Covid spending; the bill on the table doesn’t do that. Republicans must do better if they want to keep the majority.
… See MoreSee Less

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 31
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 11

Comment on Facebook

Right on, as usual! Thanks for all your clear-headed messages.

We need a balanced budget amendment! Deficit spending needs to end!

Just sick of BOTH parties. Neither are there for the Working Americans. BOTH parties responsible for the theft going on. Repubs should have read the bills that gave away money..

Nailed it

Liz Peek Well written, my friend!

Convention of States is looking better everyday.

Honestly you should be somewhere in Trumps administration Liz.. Just sayin

As much as I want a win on the BBB, I’m torn. I find it very difficult to believe that they can’t find more to cut spending

Is TERM LIMiTS in this big beautiful bill? Everything else is.
If not, why not?
Past time to cut the deadwood and get “servants” of We the People seated who will do the job more responsibly..

Following.

CUT MORE SPENDING!!!

View more comments

Liz Peek

2 days ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

4 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies