Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
Biden’s overdue sanctions on Russian oil are a slap at Trump
January 17, 2025

Biden’s overdue sanctions on Russian oil are a slap at Trump

Liz Peek Articles

Oil prices are rising, and you can thank President Biden. 

By sanctioning Russian tankers and producers in recent days — something that should have been done over a year ago — the president has caused oil prices to soar, climbing from a low on Dec. 6 of $67 per barrel for West Texas Intermediate crude to nearly $80, a jump of nearly 19 percent. Strong economic data has contributed to the rise, but shutting down Russian exports is a game-changer.

Gasoline prices have also increased, up 4.4 percent in December, posing a challenge for President-elect Donald Trump, who has promised to put a lid on inflation.  

Pushing oil prices higher is not the only way Biden is gleefully spreading nails onto the path of his successor, but it is one of the nastiest. Biden and his team know that spiking gasoline prices could undermine Donald Trump’s honeymoon; they would like nothing more. And they know that if the Trump White House moves to undo those sanctions, in a move to keep oil prices subdued, the president will face renewed charges that he is in thrall to Vladimir Putin.

This is not the White House’s only policy move that could dull Trump’s popularity and complicate his administration’s start-up. In its waning weeks, the Biden White House been busily punishing its foes and rewarding friends, arguably becoming more active than it has been for the past four years.  

Just recently, Biden’s Federal Trade Commission sued John Deere (a company that recently dropped the president’s cherished DEI initiatives) for allegedly restricting customers’ ability to get tractors serviced by non-Deere enterprises. In addition, the White House has funneled additional billions into wiping out student loans, even though the courts have ruled such actions illegal. It also published special counsel Jack Smith’s report on his investigation into Donald Trump’s supposed attempts to overturn the 2020 election. The liberal media celebrated Smith’s claim that Trump would have been convicted at trial. But what else was he going to say? Was he going to deem his own work a waste of time? The report was, by its nature, one-sided and inconclusive.

In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission just sued Elon Musk, accusing him of not notifying that agency or shareholders of his purchases of Twitter shares in early 2022. They claim that, by hiding his accumulation of stock, Musk was able to buy the company on the cheap. 

It’s an amusing claim, given that Musk spent an almost certainly excessive $44 billion to buy Twitter; no one could possibly argue that was a bargain. His lawyer described the violation as “an alleged administrative failure to file a single form” that, if proven, would “carry a nominal penalty.” Musk, of course, has grown close to President-elect Trump; most will view this lawsuit as a politically motivated parting shot.  

But more consequential than any of these last-ditch efforts to scuttle Trump or build a credible legacy is the Treasury Department’s sanctioning of Russian oil producers, oilfield service providers and tankers. In a statement describing the moves, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said, “The United States is taking sweeping action against Russia’s key source of revenue for funding its brutal and illegal war against Ukraine.” She added that the increased sanctions were in addition to policies adopted in 2022 to cap the prices Russia receives for its oil.

The Biden administration has gingerly tried to restrict Russia’s oil exports and income while not causing any real hike in energy costs, a laudable goal but one that has undoubtedly prolonged the conflict with Ukraine. Our NATO allies have been willing partners in this delicate two-step; their leaders, too, are politically vulnerable to rising energy costs. 

Yellen, and Biden, should explain why they did not adopt these more aggressive measures earlier in the war. The reason is simple: Biden was scared of the political fall-out from higher oil prices.    

After all, record-setting $5 per gallon gas in June 2022 caused one of the biggest hits to Biden’s popularity and approval ratings. That’s why Biden dumped 40 percent of the oil stored in America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve in the run-up to the midterm elections; he was taking no chances on oil and gasoline prices rising further.

The half-measures taken by the Biden administration to limit Russian oil production since the war began have not had much impact. Russian oil production is down only 8 percent from the month before Putin invaded his neighbor. In January 2022, Russia produced about 10 million barrels per day; last September (latest available), output had dropped only to 9.7 mb/d. 

However, higher prices received for their exports boosted income. The International Energy Agency reports that though “Russia’s crude oil and oil products exports fell 350,000 barrels per day last year,” revenue rose 2 percent — that’s $3.8 billion.

To win a war, it is sometimes necessary to make some sacrifices. A few months after Putin sent troops into Ukraine, Biden promised the U.S. and its allies were going to “squeeze” the aggressor country by denying Russia most-favored-nation status, cutting it off from International Monetary Fund or World Bank loans, cracking down on Moscow’s oligarchs and banning the import of vodka, diamonds and seafoods. Not a word about interrupting Russia’s oil exports, the lifeblood of its economy.  

Hence, even as the West has given Ukraine hundreds of billions of dollars to prop up its economy and wage its war, Russia has been allowed to continue a high level of oil and gas exports. China has been Putin’s willing enabler, an unwelcome development on many fronts, taking advantage of the discounted price Moscow can charge. 

Biden’s half-hearted prosecution of the Ukraine war, his frequent delays in providing necessary equipment and limitations placed on Kiev’s aggression has led to a stalemate. If he had blocked Russian oil exports early on, convinced Americans that higher energy costs were a small price to pay for protecting against Putin’s adventurism, and truly starved Moscow of funds, the war might already be over. 

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5090743-biden-sanctions-russian-oil

Published in The Hill

Biden keeps smearing lipstick on his pig of a presidency. You won’t believe the results Donald Trump is our president and Democrats have no idea what to do

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

4 hours ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
I am alternately peeved and sympathetic with Chip Roy, Ralph Norman and the others who torpedoed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But after reading the fine print this morning and realizing that reforms to Medicaid don’t kick in until 2029 !!!! I am disgusted. I get that states need some time to adjust to a change in rules regarding Medicaid eligibility – maybe a year or 18 months — but do they really need four years? No, they do not. The extended timeframe is an obvious play to put political repercussions off until after the midterms. Legislators from swing districts fear losing their seats because able-bodied adults lose their free ride. They want to put off any change as long as possible.
On the other hand, those vulnerable legislators will almost certainly get canned if the 2017 tax cuts don’t get extended and Trump’s agenda crashes. We need both to get the bill passed, and to make it tougher.
The conservatives calling for bigger spending cuts are completely correct. Just ask Moody’s, which in recent days downgraded U.S. debt. Imagine, the United States of America has lost its triple-A status. (The other two major ratings agencies had already made this downgrade.) This would be a wake-up call except that most of our country is asleep, lulled into a false sense of complacency by hours spent on Tik-Tok or watching the NFL. We all need downtime, for sure, but we also need to pay attention to what’s happening with our country’s fiscal outlook. It isn’t good. Even the Fed, no friend to the Trump administration or to fiscal austerity, has announced it will cut staff and overhead. Of course, why the Fed has a headcount of 24,000 is a mystery. How can they employ so many people and still get it wrong most of the time? This is the group that never spoke out against Biden’s reckless spending; it’s quite the switch.
Simply put, the country endorsed a huge surge in government spending to compensate for the wrong-headed directives during Covid that shut down schools, businesses and churches. The government under Trump wanted to keep Americans employed and the economy ready to rebound, which it did. Biden kept the spending at max level, refusing to let a crisis go to waste. Democrats in Congress and the Fed went along, spurring the highest inflation in decades.
Now we have to go back to the trend-line pre-Covid spending; the bill on the table doesn’t do that. Republicans must do better if they want to keep the majority.
… See MoreSee Less

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 18
  • Shares: 2
  • Comments: 5

Comment on Facebook

Nailed it

We need a balanced budget amendment! Deficit spending needs to end!

Just sick of BOTH parties. Neither are there for the Working Americans. BOTH parties responsible for the theft going on. Repubs should have read the bills that gave away money..

Convention of States is looking better everyday.

Honestly you should be somewhere in Trumps administration Liz.. Just sayin

View more comments

Liz Peek

1 day ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

3 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies