Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
Do voters really want another four years of Biden-Harris policies? 
October 25, 2024

Do voters really want another four years of Biden-Harris policies? 

Liz Peek Articles

Do voters really want to re-up for four more years of Biden-Harris policies? This is the main question of the 2024 election, since Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris has said she cannot think of a single thing she would do differently from President Biden. 

Consider the mess Biden and Harris have created. Their outrageous federal spending delivered inflation at multi-decadal highs. This is now spawning worker pay hikes that could well spur a second round of price increases. The consumer is tapped out, and the jobs market is now softening. Meanwhile, North Korea has moved closer to Russia. Iran and Saudi Arabia are apparently set to host joint military exercises for the first time. Israel is under siege. Will voters elect Harris to deal with these problems, most of which her own administration created or let happen?

Inflation has come down, but the general Biden-Harris price increase of more than 20 percent is probably with us forever. And even now, further inflation hasn’t disappeared. The core Consumer Price Index (excluding food and energy) in September rose 3.3 percent from the year earlier, accelerating for the first time since 2023 and stubbornly higher than the 2 percent target set by the Federal Reserve. That’s why interest rates (and mortgage rates) have surprised investors by moving up, not down, despite a recent Fed rate cut.

Looking ahead, news that Boeing’s machinists have just turned down a contract offering a 35 percent pay hike over four years is concerning. The rejection of a nearly 9 percent annual pay increase confirms the warningscoming from a Strategas study showing that inflation surges are almost always followed by a second wave of price hikes. That’s partly because workers who see their real wages drop tend to demand that they be made whole.

East Coast dockworkers, whose crippling strike was halted only until January, are looking for a similar pay boost. Their prospective deal with a shipping group reportedly included a 61.5 percent wage increase over six years, as well as a ban on port automation, which they view as threatening their jobs. Those are unreasonable demands, but will a new president risk shutting down a large sector of the economy to push back?

In a bid to attract blue-collar votes, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have encouraged labor groups to organize and, like the UAW, to negotiate for aggressive wage increases. Those demands are a ticking time bomb, as the costs will inevitably be passed along to consumers.    

Meanwhile, Bloomberg reports that consumer debt is through the roof — up almost 50 percent in the last three years. Spending habits formed during the post-COVID Biden bonanza days are hard to squelch. Now they are being kept alive through massive borrowing, which is spawning rising delinquencies. Consumer sentiment, already depressed, is trending downward, as concerns about high prices and a softer job market escalate. 

Eventually, the consumer will fold and the economy will stall.   

It isn’t just consumers who have piled up debt, of course — so has the federal government. Our deficit rose to more than $1.8 trillion in the latest fiscal year, 8 percent above the fiscal 2023 total, even as post-pandemic it was meant to start coming down.   

Economists and legislators are increasingly sounding the alarm: Budget-busting federal spending must end. As the BRIC nations convene and push for the creation of an alternative to the dollar, these concerns only become more acute.  

Famed investor Paul Tudor Jones said on CNBC recently: “We are going to be broke really quickly unless we get serious about dealing with our spending issues.” Putting his money where his mouth is, Jones added, “Post election, I will own zero treasuries and will be shorting the long end of the curve.” This red flag is effectively a prediction that, down the road, there will be fewer buyers of our government debt.

If Congress takes action (unlikely) and begins to cut spending, or if Elon Musk actually makes the government more efficient and less costly, that would be a win for the U.S. — but also without doubt a drag on growth. 

Meanwhile, while Joe Biden brags about bringing our allies closer, he has also knitted together what George W. Bush might have called a robust axis of evil. With his timid, limited backing of Ukraine, Biden has allowed its conflict against Russia to drag on with no end in sight. A million Russians and Ukrainians are said to have died because of Vladimir Putin’s aggression. But assuming that Russia would run out of money or troops while Ukraine plays defense has proven a fantasy. North Korea is reportedly sending highly trained regiments to Russia, buttressing its capabilities, while China’s ties to the Kremlin have never been more secure or more ominous.   

In the Middle East, Biden’s insane adherence to Barack Obama’s coddling of Iran has led to the worst regional conflict in decades. The Biden-Harris White House failed to enforce the tough sanctions that Donald Trump imposed on the terror-backing regime, allowing Iran’s oil exports and income to expand exponentially. As a result, billions have gone toward arming and enabling Iran’s proxies, including Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis.  

The U.S. is caught up in this conflict, and the path forward almost certainly entails more bloodshed and more outlays for the defense of Israel. 

None of this had to happen. When Trump left office, the Gulf Arab nations were partnering with Israel, eager to provide a bulwark against Iran’s militancy. The Abraham Accords provided the most hopeful path toward Middle East peace in a generation; the agreements were squandered by an inept and wrong-headed White House.

These are just a few of the tests awaiting the next president. In addition, the influx of millions of migrants has stressed the budgets of cities and towns across the nation. Our open border has invited in hundreds on the terror watch list, creating a serious national security threat. 

Is Harris, who has partnered with Biden in creating these problems for the past four years, able to deal with these challenges? Voters will soon decide. 

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4951530-harris-biden-four-more-years

Published in The Hill

Three reasons why Trump’s plan to indict Harris over illegal immigration is the right call Momentum shifts against Kamala Harris just days before election and here’s why

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

10 hours ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
I am alternately peeved and sympathetic with Chip Roy, Ralph Norman and the others who torpedoed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But after reading the fine print this morning and realizing that reforms to Medicaid don’t kick in until 2029 !!!! I am disgusted. I get that states need some time to adjust to a change in rules regarding Medicaid eligibility – maybe a year or 18 months — but do they really need four years? No, they do not. The extended timeframe is an obvious play to put political repercussions off until after the midterms. Legislators from swing districts fear losing their seats because able-bodied adults lose their free ride. They want to put off any change as long as possible.
On the other hand, those vulnerable legislators will almost certainly get canned if the 2017 tax cuts don’t get extended and Trump’s agenda crashes. We need both to get the bill passed, and to make it tougher.
The conservatives calling for bigger spending cuts are completely correct. Just ask Moody’s, which in recent days downgraded U.S. debt. Imagine, the United States of America has lost its triple-A status. (The other two major ratings agencies had already made this downgrade.) This would be a wake-up call except that most of our country is asleep, lulled into a false sense of complacency by hours spent on Tik-Tok or watching the NFL. We all need downtime, for sure, but we also need to pay attention to what’s happening with our country’s fiscal outlook. It isn’t good. Even the Fed, no friend to the Trump administration or to fiscal austerity, has announced it will cut staff and overhead. Of course, why the Fed has a headcount of 24,000 is a mystery. How can they employ so many people and still get it wrong most of the time? This is the group that never spoke out against Biden’s reckless spending; it’s quite the switch.
Simply put, the country endorsed a huge surge in government spending to compensate for the wrong-headed directives during Covid that shut down schools, businesses and churches. The government under Trump wanted to keep Americans employed and the economy ready to rebound, which it did. Biden kept the spending at max level, refusing to let a crisis go to waste. Democrats in Congress and the Fed went along, spurring the highest inflation in decades.
Now we have to go back to the trend-line pre-Covid spending; the bill on the table doesn’t do that. Republicans must do better if they want to keep the majority.
… See MoreSee Less

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 30
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 9

Comment on Facebook

Right on, as usual! Thanks for all your clear-headed messages.

We need a balanced budget amendment! Deficit spending needs to end!

Liz Peek Well written, my friend!

Just sick of BOTH parties. Neither are there for the Working Americans. BOTH parties responsible for the theft going on. Repubs should have read the bills that gave away money..

Nailed it

Convention of States is looking better everyday.

Honestly you should be somewhere in Trumps administration Liz.. Just sayin

Is TERM LIMiTS in this big beautiful bill? Everything else is.
If not, why not?
Past time to cut the deadwood and get “servants” of We the People seated who will do the job more responsibly..

Following.

View more comments

Liz Peek

1 day ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

3 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies