Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
DOGE is no joke — don’t underestimate Trump’s attack on government inefficiency
November 15, 2024

DOGE is no joke — don’t underestimate Trump’s attack on government inefficiency

Liz Peek Articles

How entertaining it will be in coming months to watch Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy take a hatchet to our bloated, inefficient federal government. After all, their threats to do just that are already causing massive meltdowns on the left, and they haven’t fired a single person. 

Entertaining, yes, but shrinking our government and cutting unnecessary regulations is also deadly serious. 

Elon Musk recently posted: “The excess government spending is what causes inflation!” He is right, and it is clear from recent CPI and PPI reports that the fight against inflation has stalled. Spending must drop.  

Outsized federal outlays are driving prices higher and undermining our fiscal health, while the regulatory blitz undertaken by Joe Biden’s government hampers the growth necessary to dig out from under our government debt.   

The CBO reports that “in fiscal 2024, the deficit was equal to 6.4 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product,” above the 50-year average of 3.8 percent. That 6.4 percent “has been exceeded only six times since 1946 (from 2009 through 2012 and in 2020 and 2021)” — that is, when we experienced a national emergency. The past two years saw deficits jump, from $1.4 trillion in fiscal 2022 to $1.8 trillion in fiscal 2024, despite there being no emergency (other than Democrats desperate to maintain power).      

This is why President-elect Donald Trump is calling his newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE, of course) this era’s Manhattan Project. DOGE must — and will — stop the gravy train.  

Democrats hate the idea; for them, Big Government is the solution to every woe.  

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren went on X to mock Trump’s appointment of the two outsider billionaires charged with overseeing DOGE. She posted: “The Office of Government Efficiency is off to a great start with split leadership: two people to do the work of one person. Yeah, this seems REALLY efficient.” 

Unhappily for Warren, who should know better than to match wits with Elon Musk, the SpaceX founder couldn’t resist parrying her snide post by retorting, “Unlike you, neither of us are [sic] being paid, so it is very efficient indeed. DOGE will do great things for the American people. Let history be the judge.” Touche! (Well, except maybe for the grammar.)   

In the coming months, we will see a massive mobilization of citizen-investigators uncovering vast amounts of federal waste and fraud, bringing voters aboard their mission.   

It has already begun. People are already posting examples of fraud on X, like the Illinois man who pleaded guilty to bilking the Department of Health and Human Services out of $14 million for COVID-19 testing that his lab never actually performed.  

Other examples of squandered funds will pour in. Michael Kaplan and James Franey, writing at the New York Post, recently published a summary of “$386 billion in government waste.” Included in this horrifying rundown: $1.3 billion in checks sent out in 2023 from the IRS, Medicare and veterans’ groups to dead people in just 2023 alone; $171 million in unemployment payments or Social Security given to criminals the government thought were unemployed but who were actually in prison; and $15 million per year reportedly being spent on personal security for Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

Open the Books, a watchdog organization that annually reports on stupid things financed by our tax dollars, reports, for example, that the Department of Health and Human Service is dishing out nearly $40 million per year on 294 employees tasked with overseeing diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives for the Biden-Harris White House. My guess — there’s abut $40 million a year taxpayers will get back. 

Some of the New York Post’s revelations are priceless. For instance, its report states that in 2021, the National Institutes of Health handed $549,000 to a Russian lab that performed surgery on cats to see if they could still walk on a treadmill after a section of brain had been removed.  It also relates that $20,600 was spent by the State Department in 2022 to produce 12 drag theater performances in Ecuador. 

It’s somewhat comical to read that $7 billion is spent annually on federal office space, even though some 88 percent of that space is unused, but there’s no humor in discovering that somewhere between $200 billion and half a trillion dollars of COVID relief programs was effectively stolen. Monies were dispatched quickly to keep the economy from buckling under the pandemic shutdown, but oversight was nonexistent.  

This is a major reason DOGE will be so vital to our future — huge government spending encourages gigantic amounts of theft and corruption. “ALL government spending is taxation” rightly says Musk. But stolen government spending is an especially harmful tax, in that it does no good at all and robs programs meant to help people.  

Ditto the regulatory burden that stems from excess government red tape spewed across businesses and individuals. The Competitive Enterprise Institute estimates that, “Federal regulatory burdens cost the average household more than $15,000 per year — more than food, clothing, education, or any other household expense except for housing. In total, regulation imposed a $2.1 trillion total cost, rivaling the $2.3 trillion income tax cost.” DOGE will take a crack at undoing some of that damaging red tape.  

Unlike past efforts to streamline government, like Ronald Reagan’s Grace Commission, which resulted in a mammoth report that went unread by Congress, DOGE’s activities will be public, posting on X and inviting public comment (and scrutiny.) That will make it impossible for Congress to ignore.  

Ramaswamy promises that on America’s 250th anniversary, July 4, 2026, “DOGE will deliver our nation the birthday gift of a government that’s actually accountable to its people, rather than the other way around.” What a gift that would be. And what a victory for President-elect Trump! 

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/4991454-musk-ramaswamy-department-of-government-efficiency

Published in The Hill

The one reason Trump won that Democrats cannot admit Congestion Pricing Emerges as a Self-Defeating Choice for New York and for Governor Hochul

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

4 hours ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
I am alternately peeved and sympathetic with Chip Roy, Ralph Norman and the others who torpedoed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But after reading the fine print this morning and realizing that reforms to Medicaid don’t kick in until 2029 !!!! I am disgusted. I get that states need some time to adjust to a change in rules regarding Medicaid eligibility – maybe a year or 18 months — but do they really need four years? No, they do not. The extended timeframe is an obvious play to put political repercussions off until after the midterms. Legislators from swing districts fear losing their seats because able-bodied adults lose their free ride. They want to put off any change as long as possible.
On the other hand, those vulnerable legislators will almost certainly get canned if the 2017 tax cuts don’t get extended and Trump’s agenda crashes. We need both to get the bill passed, and to make it tougher.
The conservatives calling for bigger spending cuts are completely correct. Just ask Moody’s, which in recent days downgraded U.S. debt. Imagine, the United States of America has lost its triple-A status. (The other two major ratings agencies had already made this downgrade.) This would be a wake-up call except that most of our country is asleep, lulled into a false sense of complacency by hours spent on Tik-Tok or watching the NFL. We all need downtime, for sure, but we also need to pay attention to what’s happening with our country’s fiscal outlook. It isn’t good. Even the Fed, no friend to the Trump administration or to fiscal austerity, has announced it will cut staff and overhead. Of course, why the Fed has a headcount of 24,000 is a mystery. How can they employ so many people and still get it wrong most of the time? This is the group that never spoke out against Biden’s reckless spending; it’s quite the switch.
Simply put, the country endorsed a huge surge in government spending to compensate for the wrong-headed directives during Covid that shut down schools, businesses and churches. The government under Trump wanted to keep Americans employed and the economy ready to rebound, which it did. Biden kept the spending at max level, refusing to let a crisis go to waste. Democrats in Congress and the Fed went along, spurring the highest inflation in decades.
Now we have to go back to the trend-line pre-Covid spending; the bill on the table doesn’t do that. Republicans must do better if they want to keep the majority.
… See MoreSee Less

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 21
  • Shares: 3
  • Comments: 6

Comment on Facebook

We need a balanced budget amendment! Deficit spending needs to end!

Liz Peek Well written, my friend!

Nailed it

Just sick of BOTH parties. Neither are there for the Working Americans. BOTH parties responsible for the theft going on. Repubs should have read the bills that gave away money..

Convention of States is looking better everyday.

Honestly you should be somewhere in Trumps administration Liz.. Just sayin

View more comments

Liz Peek

1 day ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

3 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies