Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
If men don’t vote, Harris wins
November 5, 2024

If men don’t vote, Harris wins

Liz Peek Articles

It’s Election Day, at last.  Though we don’t know who will win this razor-tight contest, we do know that if V.P. Kamala Harris becomes our next president, it will be because men failed to show up. 

Consider the early voting in Georgia: as of November 4, 2.2 million women had cast ballots, outnumbering male voters by 27%. In North Carolina, similarly, 2.3 million women had voted as of November 2, compared to 1.8 million men. That may be why former President Donald Trump is visiting North Carolina again in the final hours of campaigning – even though polls show him leading in the state. 

Higher voting by women matters because this election shows the greatest gender divide in our history. Men are backing Trump by eight points, according to Pew polling, and women favor Harris by 9 points, a gender gap of 17 points.  The gap gets even wider when further divided by level of education; college-educated women break for Harris by 27 points, while non-college educated men back Trump by 16 points – a gap of 43 points.

Why the stark difference? Because college-educated women, according to the New York Times, are most concerned about abortion, while non-college educated men put economic issues ahead of every other concern. Women with a college degree tend to be better off than most Americans (though apparently not wiser) so, for them, inflation and the jobs market are lesser concerns.  

The bad news for Trump is that there are more women than men registered to vote. In 2020, there were 89 million women signed up to vote, compared to 79.3 million men. Moreover, since 1980, women have voted at higher rates than men. Four years ago, for instance, 68.4% of eligible women turned out to vote, compared to 65% of eligible men. Did that difference put Biden in the Oval Office? Probably, and it could happen again. 

If men think Trump has a huge lead and their vote won’t matter, they’re dead wrong. The last few elections have been decided by a whisker. In 2020, President Joe Biden won by just 45,000 votes; four years earlier, former president Donald Trump beat Democrat Hillary Clinton by an estimated 107,000 votes in three swing states, out of 120 million votes cast nationwide. This race looks just as close. 

Gentlemen: if Trump is your pick and you think he’s got it knocked, think again. In the last few days, reports have shown some troubling early voting trends, while polls and betting odds have shifted once again, this time in favor of Kamala Harris. A shocking poll in red state Iowa showing Harris with a three-point lead is a major warning bell for the GOP.  

Most surveys now show the contest to be a dead heat, but they could be wrong. Remember that in 2022, many expected a “red wave” – voters angry about the open border and high inflation were expected to hand Republicans a large majority in the House and control of the Senate. It didn’t happen; the GOP took the House with the slimmest of margins and Democrats continued to have a slight advantage in the senate. Embarrassed pollsters on both sides of the aisle revisited their models and tried to explain how they got it so wrong. 

The answer is simple: women, and especially white female college grads, were motivated by the overturning of Roe v Wade by the Supreme Court to vote against pro-life candidates; where states put the issue on the ballot, women showed up in unexpectedly high numbers.  

That issue has not faded, even as numerous states, like New York, have enshrined abortion rights in local law.  Democrat candidates in the Empire State, trying to unseat members of congress like Republican Mike Lawler, are running dishonest ads claiming that the GOP freshman wants to ban abortion nationwide. This is despite Lawler’s many denials and the fact that a nationwide referendum on the issue is not even close to being a possibility. New York passed its own heinous “abortion without limits” law several years ago; the right to choose in the state is not an issue.

Kamala Harris continues to pound away on abortion rights, lying to voters about Trump’s intention to ban the procedure nationwide. He has repeatedly stated he has no such aim, but Harris knows this is an issue that will drive people to the polls.

She is right. Eleven states, including swing states Arizona and Nevada, have an abortion measure on the ballot; those propositions will help attract female voters, possibly impacting those swing states’ outcomes and also senate races in Maryland, Montana, Nebraska as well as numerous other down-ballot contests.

What is Trump’s best issue – the one that will encourage men to vote? That would be the open border and illegal immigration, which can legitimately be blamed on Vice President Harris, who was put in charge of the border by Joe Biden. Some 12 million people entered the U.S. illegally on Harris’ watch, and she didn’t do a thing about it until the polls suggested voters had had enough.

Illegal immigration is driving down wages for lower-income Americans, costing blue cities a fortune, creating a national security risk, sopping up housing and medical care and driving crime higher. The Biden-Harris White House encouraged and welcomed this migrant flood, expecting those millions of people would eventually become Democrat voters; it was a major poke in the eye to all Americans, including legal immigrants.

If Harris becomes president, it is entirely possible that she re-opens the border, and allows unlimited illegal immigration for another four years. As on so many topics (reparations, EV mandates, sanctuary cities etc.), she has not told voters what she wants to do. 

Guys – voting is a duty as well as a right; if you don’t participate you are not allowed to grumble later about the outcome being “rigged” or “unfair”. If you don’t vote, Donald Trump will lose.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/men-dont-vote-harris-wins

Published on Fox News

Why would anyone ever listen to Never Trumpers from The New York Times? Three reasons Trump triumphed

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

12 hours ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
I am alternately peeved and sympathetic with Chip Roy, Ralph Norman and the others who torpedoed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But after reading the fine print this morning and realizing that reforms to Medicaid don’t kick in until 2029 !!!! I am disgusted. I get that states need some time to adjust to a change in rules regarding Medicaid eligibility – maybe a year or 18 months — but do they really need four years? No, they do not. The extended timeframe is an obvious play to put political repercussions off until after the midterms. Legislators from swing districts fear losing their seats because able-bodied adults lose their free ride. They want to put off any change as long as possible.
On the other hand, those vulnerable legislators will almost certainly get canned if the 2017 tax cuts don’t get extended and Trump’s agenda crashes. We need both to get the bill passed, and to make it tougher.
The conservatives calling for bigger spending cuts are completely correct. Just ask Moody’s, which in recent days downgraded U.S. debt. Imagine, the United States of America has lost its triple-A status. (The other two major ratings agencies had already made this downgrade.) This would be a wake-up call except that most of our country is asleep, lulled into a false sense of complacency by hours spent on Tik-Tok or watching the NFL. We all need downtime, for sure, but we also need to pay attention to what’s happening with our country’s fiscal outlook. It isn’t good. Even the Fed, no friend to the Trump administration or to fiscal austerity, has announced it will cut staff and overhead. Of course, why the Fed has a headcount of 24,000 is a mystery. How can they employ so many people and still get it wrong most of the time? This is the group that never spoke out against Biden’s reckless spending; it’s quite the switch.
Simply put, the country endorsed a huge surge in government spending to compensate for the wrong-headed directives during Covid that shut down schools, businesses and churches. The government under Trump wanted to keep Americans employed and the economy ready to rebound, which it did. Biden kept the spending at max level, refusing to let a crisis go to waste. Democrats in Congress and the Fed went along, spurring the highest inflation in decades.
Now we have to go back to the trend-line pre-Covid spending; the bill on the table doesn’t do that. Republicans must do better if they want to keep the majority.
… See MoreSee Less

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 30
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 9

Comment on Facebook

Right on, as usual! Thanks for all your clear-headed messages.

We need a balanced budget amendment! Deficit spending needs to end!

Just sick of BOTH parties. Neither are there for the Working Americans. BOTH parties responsible for the theft going on. Repubs should have read the bills that gave away money..

Nailed it

Liz Peek Well written, my friend!

Convention of States is looking better everyday.

Honestly you should be somewhere in Trumps administration Liz.. Just sayin

Is TERM LIMiTS in this big beautiful bill? Everything else is.
If not, why not?
Past time to cut the deadwood and get “servants” of We the People seated who will do the job more responsibly..

Following.

View more comments

Liz Peek

2 days ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

3 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies