Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
Presidential debate: Surprising things Harris, Trump need to do to win over voters or risk losing it all
September 10, 2024

Presidential debate: Surprising things Harris, Trump need to do to win over voters or risk losing it all

Liz Peek Articles

How important is Tuesday night’s debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris? Extremely important: based on the evening’s face-off in Philadelphia, voters could well decide who becomes the next president of the United States.

Why such drama? Because Vice President Kamala Harris adopted, weeks ago, a ridiculous campaign strategy of hiding from voters as much as possible and committing to few policies; she has refused to do solo interviews or press conferences and until Monday had neglected to post any policy positions on her campaign’s website. Unlike every other candidate in recent history, she did not endure a grueling primary contest to win her slot on the ballot. She was, instead, anointed by Democratic Party power brokers.

As a result, 28% of voters in a recent New York Times/Siena poll said they “still need to learn more about Kamala Harris,” while only 9% said they needed more information about Donald Trump. 

That puts tremendous pressure on Harris to define herself in a winning way before Tuesday night’s audience. The first face-to-face between former Sen. Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in 2016 drew 84 million viewers; Tuesday’s debate could attract even more. 

Harris and her team are feeling the pressure. They have engaged in considerable bickering about the rules of the debate, hosted by ABC News, especially focusing on whether each candidate’s microphone will be muted while their opponent is talking. Harris wanted mics left open, most likely so that she could reprise the moment during the vice presidential debate in 2020 when she reprimanded incumbent Vice President Mike Pence for talking over her.  

But all that whining reveals that Harris is terrified that policy will be the focal point on Tuesday night; she wants voters to focus on optics. We are not surprised; Harris has flip-flopped on nearly every progressive issue central to her 2019 primary campaign – gun confiscation, Medicare for All, EV mandates, building a border wall, decriminalizing illegal immigration, and banning fracking. She has not articulated these reversals; that has been left to “anonymous” campaign staffers. As we saw in her rare interview with CNN’s Dana Bash, she is unable to explain why her views have shifted; asked by Bash whether voters can trust her, she claims her values have not changed, even as her policies have. 

Unfortunately for Harris, over the weekend Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders said the quiet part out loud  when he told an interviewer that he didn’t think her progressive positions have changed, but that Harris is simply saying what she needs to win the election. Oops. 

The New York Times has reported that some 18% of the electorate is up for grabs – perhaps leaning one way or the other but not yet committed. That seems high, especially given that in their most recent poll only 5% of voters declared themselves undecided; whatever the number is, though, it probably far exceeds the 44,000 votes in Georgia, Wisconsin and Arizona that determined the outcome of the 2020 election. 

With most polls showing the race a dead heat, including in the vital swing states, much is at stake.

Kamala Harris has, arguably, the heavier lift at Tuesday’s debate. She could win the debate, not by goading Trump, but by convincing voters she understands how the economy works, why people are unhappy with open borders, how she will stem the crime surge and get our cities back on track. 

A majority of Americans think they were better off during Trump’s presidency than during the recent Biden-Harris tenure; why will that change? After all, both President Joe Biden and Harris have, over the past three-plus years, earned epically low approval ratings and driven both consumer and business sentiment way below historical norms.

Harris does not appear to have a deep well of core beliefs to guide her. She is no Ronald Reagan, who never wavered on prioritizing peace through strength or on his disdain for an encroaching federal government. Reagan crushed Democrat incumbent Jimmy Carter in their 1980 debate largely because he had the courage of his convictions and it showed.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, needs to appeal to voters who like his policies but don’t like his personality. In a recent survey comparing views of Trump and Biden, Pew research found voters more likely to agree with Trump on issues, but to prefer Biden’s personal behavior. For instance, 64% of all voters said that Trump was “mean-spirited”, compared to 31% who described Biden in that way.   

Unlike Harris, Trump has a known policy agenda and is favored on several critical issues including managing the economy and immigration. He needs to stick to those issues, touting facts confirming, for instance, the real income and employment gains made by all demographic groups under his presidency. And he needs to blast Biden and Harris for igniting inflation through reckless government spending.

Most important, the former president should smile. Yes – smile. Trump has to compete against Harris’ “joy” by looking cheerful. The former president has been so demonized by the press that people would be shocked to see him as a likeable and friendly fellow. There’s a reason that bankers and investors stuck with Trump during his many ups and downs and that he has such a loyal following. He would do well to display his more positive side, as he did to rave reviews during the GOP convention. In his first 2020 debate against Joe Biden, Trump was truculent and glowering; it was a disaster.

The Times/Siena poll shows Trump leading Harris by one point, which is bad news for Democrats. In September 2020, the same poll showed Joe Biden ahead of Trump by 8 points. Also worrisome for Harris, who is promising a “new way forward”: over 60% of respondents agree that “the next president should represent a major change from Joe Biden.” 

A majority of Americans think Donald Trump offers that “major change,” not Kamala Harris. She may be running away from Joe Biden, but she can’t run far.  

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/presidential-debate-surprising-things-harris-trump-need-do-win-over-voters

Published on Fox News


Sorry, Goldman Sachs — Trump will be better for the economy  The biggest loser in the Trump-Harris debate

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

17 hours ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
I am alternately peeved and sympathetic with Chip Roy, Ralph Norman and the others who torpedoed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But after reading the fine print this morning and realizing that reforms to Medicaid don’t kick in until 2029 !!!! I am disgusted. I get that states need some time to adjust to a change in rules regarding Medicaid eligibility – maybe a year or 18 months — but do they really need four years? No, they do not. The extended timeframe is an obvious play to put political repercussions off until after the midterms. Legislators from swing districts fear losing their seats because able-bodied adults lose their free ride. They want to put off any change as long as possible.
On the other hand, those vulnerable legislators will almost certainly get canned if the 2017 tax cuts don’t get extended and Trump’s agenda crashes. We need both to get the bill passed, and to make it tougher.
The conservatives calling for bigger spending cuts are completely correct. Just ask Moody’s, which in recent days downgraded U.S. debt. Imagine, the United States of America has lost its triple-A status. (The other two major ratings agencies had already made this downgrade.) This would be a wake-up call except that most of our country is asleep, lulled into a false sense of complacency by hours spent on Tik-Tok or watching the NFL. We all need downtime, for sure, but we also need to pay attention to what’s happening with our country’s fiscal outlook. It isn’t good. Even the Fed, no friend to the Trump administration or to fiscal austerity, has announced it will cut staff and overhead. Of course, why the Fed has a headcount of 24,000 is a mystery. How can they employ so many people and still get it wrong most of the time? This is the group that never spoke out against Biden’s reckless spending; it’s quite the switch.
Simply put, the country endorsed a huge surge in government spending to compensate for the wrong-headed directives during Covid that shut down schools, businesses and churches. The government under Trump wanted to keep Americans employed and the economy ready to rebound, which it did. Biden kept the spending at max level, refusing to let a crisis go to waste. Democrats in Congress and the Fed went along, spurring the highest inflation in decades.
Now we have to go back to the trend-line pre-Covid spending; the bill on the table doesn’t do that. Republicans must do better if they want to keep the majority.
… See MoreSee Less

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 31
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 11

Comment on Facebook

Right on, as usual! Thanks for all your clear-headed messages.

We need a balanced budget amendment! Deficit spending needs to end!

Just sick of BOTH parties. Neither are there for the Working Americans. BOTH parties responsible for the theft going on. Repubs should have read the bills that gave away money..

Nailed it

Liz Peek Well written, my friend!

Convention of States is looking better everyday.

Honestly you should be somewhere in Trumps administration Liz.. Just sayin

As much as I want a win on the BBB, I’m torn. I find it very difficult to believe that they can’t find more to cut spending

Is TERM LIMiTS in this big beautiful bill? Everything else is.
If not, why not?
Past time to cut the deadwood and get “servants” of We the People seated who will do the job more responsibly..

Following.

CUT MORE SPENDING!!!

View more comments

Liz Peek

2 days ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

4 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies