Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
072416_sr_rosen_1280
July 25, 2016

The DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz insult Bernie and 12 million Americans

Liz Peek Articles

More than 12 million Americans voted for Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primary contest. Over 2 million sent in money – at $27 a pop, on average – to finance his campaign. Millions more felt the Bern, turned out for his rallies and cheered on his promised revolution.

Little did all those folks know that the Vermont senator with the raspy voice and big ideas never had a chance. As Sanders often suggested, the Democratic National Committee decided that Hillary Clinton would be their party’s presidential nominee long before any votes were cast. It turns out the Democratic Party isn’t so democratic after all.

The DNC, headed by longtime Clinton ally Debbie Wasserman Schultz, created a debate schedule that guaranteed low viewership, was designed to stifle competition and made sure Hillary’s dominance in superdelegates would keep rivals at bay. There was so much bad blood late last year that Sanders sued the DNC after the party denied his campaign access to important voter data, a suit that was later dismissed.

From the start, the Clinton machine rolled right over Sanders like a steamroller.

And that, it turns out, was just the beginning. As we now know from leaked emails, Wasserman Schultz was actively conspiring with operatives in her organization to discredit Sanders, to spread stories questioning his religious beliefs and to throw obstacles in his path. “He isn’t going to be president,” Wasserman Schultz proclaimed in one email message. She didn’t need to add: “if I can help it.”

Why is anyone surprised? Wasserman Schultz was co-chair of Clinton’s failed campaign in 2008, but she undermined Clinton’s confidence by secretly reaching out and pledging her support to Barack Obama even before the primaries were finished. Long criticized as putting her career ahead of the party and for ethical lapses, like arguing that the DNC should pay for her wardrobe, Wasserman Schultz had to scramble to win back Clinton’s support and to squash critics who wanted her out of the prestigious post. Nothing could prove more effective than ruthlessly blocking Clinton’s potential rivals.

In spite of everything, Sanders did a heck of a job, trading on Clinton’s dishonesty and cynicism and lofting his socialist message to a new generation far to the left of its parents.

Clinton’s embrace of the dated policies of her husband’s presidency no longer satisfied the demands of the 21st century. Sanders came close, winning 1,846 delegates to her 2,205, not including superdelegates.

It was a remarkable run, especially in light of the obstacles thrown in his path by the DNC, and it set the course for the Democrat agenda.

Hillary tried to get rid of Sanders for months, batting at him like someone beset by gnats. Buoyed by his startling success in votes and fundraising, and clearly enjoying his notoriety, Sanders wouldn’t stand down.

In the end, Hillary had to pretend to buy into his progressive agenda. She adopted his stance on trade, coming out against Obama’s cherished TPP trade deal, which she had earlier endorsed. She came around to Sanders’ position on the minimum wage and on making college tuition-free. She denounced the Keystone Pipeline, even though would-be participants in that project had donated generously to the Clinton Foundation, which kept her on the fence for years. Hillary even started calling herself a progressive.

But none of it is real. Those Sanders followers who were deceived by the DNC have also been deceived by Clinton. In picking Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine as her running mate, she tossed the Sanders revolution overboard. Kaine is not a progressive; he does not share Sanders’ push for more bank regulation. He is not opposed to the TPP; he voted in favor of the fast-track authority that was meant to facilitate the deal.

Clinton bought Sanders off with some comforting left-wing language in the Democratic platform. It did the trick. Sanders conceded and has made it clear he will support Clinton.

His followers are not so sure; they have been marching in the streets. Already there have been more protests in Philadelphia than took place all last week during the Republican convention in Cleveland. The leaked emails have convinced them that their man was cheated, and they are correct.

Sanders set is to address the Democrat convention Monday night. Will he rally his supporters to back Clinton-Kaine? Or will he rail against the insulting treatment of his campaign?

It doesn’t really matter; his moment has passed. The Secretary of the Status Quo is firmly in charge.

 

Published here.

Memo to Ted Cruz: Donald Trump Doesn’t Need You Here’s Why Hillary Clinton Could Lose This Travesty of an Election

Related Posts

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58

Articles

What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 8.06.58 AM

Articles

China underestimates Trump and his trade war — America is ready for battle

Recent Posts

  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America
  • Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 8.06.58 AMChina underestimates Trump and his trade war — America is ready for battle
  • Ignore biased polls, Trump voters love his first 100 daysIgnore biased polls, Trump voters love his first 100 days

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

13 hours ago

Liz Peek

Republicans in Congress going Squishy at Worst possible Time … See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

After a few months of celebrating Donald Trump’s astonishing political comeback by offering the president near-unanimous support, Republicans are going squishy.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 8
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

Tillis has always stabbed us in the back. Since his very first day.

Liz Peek

3 weeks ago

Liz Peek

Janet Yellen, despite a career chock full of massive blunders, continues to pontificate. Where was she when Joe Biden decided to flood a booming economy with trillions of excess (and uneeded) dollars?
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Janet Yellen is wrong about US manufacturing — and pretty much everything else

Janet Yellen remains wrong on a host of issues — including inflation, sanctions enforcement and U.S. interest rates.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 12
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 6

Comment on Facebook

Powerful article. Thank you for reporting the truth

Wrong about the U.S. dollar, as well.

Bet you that she has business in China. The way she was bowing for XI.

You support the current evil regime? Shame on YOU. thanks for pointing out someone who is no longer in control of ANYTHING. Jesus weeps. Happy Easter tho ma'am

Wrong about the U.S. dollar, as well.

She was doing the 'TRANSITORY' dance along with Biden and Powell knowing damn well that it would be misinterpreted by many to mean that prices would come back down. In the meantime, the FED sat on their asses with rates at zero for a year while inflation shot from about 2% to over 9%. These people essentially screwed Americans out of 20% of their life savings with the 40 yr high inflation while they printed and squandered. 'Grandma' Yellen is not the sweet, innocent little lady she portrays herself to be.

View more comments

Liz Peek

4 weeks ago

Liz Peek

Years of cheating by China has brought us to this place: it was bound to happen, but President Trump is the only president to confront our biggest adversary
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Trump and Xi go mano a mano on tariffs — who will back down first?

If the showdown between Xi and Trump persists, it will hurt both countries — one will have to break, and I’m guessing it won’t be Trump.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 6
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

I was an IP paralegal for over 30 years. China was the absolute worst in stealing America’s intellectual property rights. Trying to fight in their courts was impossible and took years and lots of money. Most law firms gave up. Only one employer (a big corporation) fought to the end, but still their courts ruled against us. Frustrating!!

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies