Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
Screen Shot 2018-01-30 at 4.48.40 PM
January 26, 2018

Trump challenges world’s elites at Davos — Do they want to start winning, too?

Liz Peek Articles

President Trump made the world’s elites squirm Friday in Davos, but not for the reasons many expected. Unlike his combative and dark inaugural address, the speech the president delivered at the World Economic Forum was measured and upbeat; he invited the world to invest in America, citing the tax cuts and regulatory roll-back that make “Now the perfect time to bring business, jobs and investment to the U.S.”

As he articulated the policies and successes that have shaped his first year in office, the business titans and political leaders in the audience must have felt a chill. Not because Trump was challenging or upsetting the global order, but because he was winning in the midst of it. People around the world listening to his common sense remarks must have thought: what about us? Why isn’t my president doing the same?

As Trump boasted of the stock market and job gains of the past year, the rising confidence, accelerating growth and lower unemployment, he reiterated his pledge that “as president I will always put America first…” Adding, “just like we expect the leaders of other countries should put their country first also.” Audiences thought, is my leader putting me first?

He didn’t, as some expected, threaten a trade war, but rather reiterated his stance that the U.S. welcomes trade deals that are fair and reciprocal. He indicated a willingness to enter into bilateral agreements, and also to perhaps join the TPP group, as long as it is in “the interests of all.” Why not? Trade pacts like the TPP that mostly benefit other countries are not well constructed; a World Bank study showed that while Vietnam and Malaysia would see substantial benefits from the 12-nation Asian treaty, the U.S. would see almost no gain at all – the least of all 12 countries. This is the trade deal that Obama apologists mourn.

Trump has recently called out rivals like China for unfair trade practices. He has accused them of stealing our intellectual property, dumping excess products like solar panels in an effort to drive competitors out of business and protecting domestic industries through tariffs and other barriers. He has exposed practices that have gone unchecked for too long by those in power. Beijing’s success has been enabled in part by the complicity of American corporations eager to access China’s growing market and their cheap labor; our government has played along.

As Trump vows to “protect the interests of our country, our companies and our workers,” people around the world hope their leaders will, too.

On immigration, a thorny and contentious issue not only in the U.S. but across the globe, Trump argued for policies that benefit the U.S. Yes, our doors are open, but we want immigrants that will “contribute to our economy, support themselves financially and to strengthen our country.”  Germans watching Trump’s speech, and people in France and the U.K. and other countries struggling with surging immigrant populations, must have nodded in agreement. Isn’t it wise to invite people into your country who have the talents to make your nation stronger?  Doesn’t a merit-based approach like that in Australia make sense?

Trump touted his administration’s encouragement of domestic energy production, which puts him in the crosshairs of environmentalists.  As he noted, rising oil and natural gas output is not just an economic boon to the U.S., but also promotes “energy security for our friends around the world.” As he pointed out, “No country should be held hostage to a single provider of energy.”

Germans listening to Trump might agree. That country’s dependence on Russian oil is a security and political problem. At the same time, excessive environmental regulations have led to record-high power costs that are twice those in the U.S. Some must wonder if the country’s ban on fracking, which keeps substantial natural gas reserves out of reach, are in the nation’s best interests.

In addition to touting job creation, Trump also promoted efforts to develop the workforce of the U.S., concluding that “the best anti-poverty program is a very simple and very beautiful paycheck.” Residents of developed countries, nearly all of which are struggling to support their ever-expanding social safety net would doubtless be sympathetic; what could be more important than putting people to work?

Countering the narrative that the Trump White House wants to go it alone, the president referenced his administration’s effective partnership with the UN in tightening sanctions on North Korea, the success of the coalition to defeat ISIS and the emerging cooperation in confronting Iran’s illegal missile adventures. As he is accused of withdrawing from the world stage, Trump noted his attendance at the G-7, the U.N. General Assembly and APEC. And there he was at Davos, the first president since Bill Clinton to attend the World Economic Forum.

Trump wasn’t quite the skunk at the picnic that some in Davos expected, but his “simple message” put the world’s elites on notice: “There has never been a better time to hire, to build, to invest and to grow in the United States.” Will citizens of other countries demand they follow suit? Do they want to start winning too? We shall see.

 

Published on Foxnews.com

Trump doesn’t start a trade war, just fires a warning shot across the bow Democrats panic over avalanche of good economic news

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

9 hours ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

2 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

Liz Peek

3 days ago

Liz Peek

Democrats have no platform, no message and no leader. BUT- they have decided (weirdly) to go to bat for criminals in the country illegally (a tautology.) Considering we had an election but six months ago that was all about immigration – it’s hard to fathom
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

LIZ PEEK: Democrats' bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Today’s Democratic leaders appear to have forgotten that curbing illegal immigration was a driving force behind Donald Trump’s astonishing 2024 political comeback.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 9
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies