Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
Screenshot 2024-12-13 at 8.12.19 AM
December 13, 2024

Trump was the only possible choice for Person of the Year

Liz Peek Articles

Time Magazine has officially named Donald Trump as its Person of the Year.

Of course it has. Who else could have competed for the prestigious title?  

Could it have been President Biden, who pretended for so long that he was fit to be president, and has recently torched his own legacy by granting his son Hunter a despicable open-ended pardon? Could it have been Jill Biden, presumably the power behind the Resolute Desk, wielding authority beyond her talents — and supposedly having been most responsible for pushing Joe into trying for a second term? 

Could it have been Vice President Kamala Harris, the accidental Democratic nominee whose campaign burned through $1.5 billion on the path to a resounding defeat?  

Incredibly, Harris was on the shortlist for the distinction. So was Claudia Sheinbaum, a confirmed leftist recently elected president of Mexico. Sheinbaum made a great show of standing up to Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on Mexico if her government doesn’t help close our border — I give that posture six months at most.

Notably absent from the list are some of the foreign leaders who were most excited to welcome Biden back to the White House in 2020 — for instance, France’s President Macron, whose approval rating is 23 percent and who cannot organize a functioning government for his country. Time ignored Canadian President Justin Trudeau, who is heading toward a federal election while polling at just 22 percent, compared to his conservative rival Pierre Poilievre at 43 percent.  

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer won a landslide victory for his Labour Party this year. But in the short time since, he has, according to Politico, “suffered the biggest post-election fall in approval ratings of any British prime minister in the modern era.” 

And let’s not ignore German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, whose approval rating slid to 18 percent in September and whose ruling coalition collapsed last month. Scholz has asked parliament for a confidence vote that he is likely to lose. As Germany’s economy reels from auto industry losses brought on by electric vehicle mandates, Scholz and his SPD party are likely to lose as well. 

Here’s what’s happening: Liberal establishment politicians around the world are in free-fall. They are being brought down by their slavish dedication to climate policies that are undermining their industries and economies, and unlimited immigration, as their outraged populations see foreign newcomers threatening their wages and their livelihoods. 

Voters all over the world also want to put behind them liberal follies about crime and gender. Finally, ESG and DEI, pillars of the virtue-signaling liberal orthodoxy, are falling by the wayside. 

Who had the guts to call out these misguided and reckless notions that have endangered rather than enriched the world? Trump, who has been mocked and maligned since he came down the golden escalator in 2015. He has been impeached and indicted, sued for ludicrous sums of money, hounded by law enforcement agencies and targeted for assassination. Never in the history of the world has a public figure suffered more abuse in such a short space of time — from the media, from academia, from the legal and the entertainment world. The intelligentsia declared him politically dead, and he proved them all wrong by rising again. 

This is the second year in which Trump has been named Person of the Year, celebrating and conceding that revival. Because it is clear that Trump did not just win an election. Rather, he became the most powerful and influential person in the world, even before taking office. 

Adversaries such as Trudeau have journeyed to Mar-a-Lago to plead their case. Meta CEO Jeff Zuckerberg, who banned Trump from Facebook not long ago, just donated $1 million to his inauguration fund. Leftist pundit Joe Scarborough made the trip to Palm Beach, eager to grovel and beg for access after brutally attacking Trump for years.

Already, by dint of his strength (and President Biden’s weakness), Trump is influencing events at home and overseas. FBI Director Chris Wray has announced he will retire; he does not want to suffer the humiliation of being fired for politicizing our once-great law enforcement agency. Biden is reportedly primed to hand out buckets of pardons in hopes that the misdeeds of people like Anthony Fauci, under fire for his organization’s funding of gain-of-function research, or Adam Schiff, who hit Trump repeatedly over his ties to Moscow, will go unpunished. Biden knows a reckoning is coming, and he hopes that he, his allies, and his family can escape accountability.  

Even now, there is already progress at the border. Some migrants are turning back from their northward journey, worried they will be apprehended and deported by a Trump administration. Asylum grants are down, falling to 36 percent of requests being approved in October, down from more than 50 percent in fiscal 2023. Coincidence? Not likely.  

Perhaps most significant is Iran’s decision not to counterattack Israel in the days after the election, with Iranian and Israeli officials telling Sky News that Trump’s win inspired Iran’s caution. Similarly, there are signs that both Ukraine and Russia are ready to discuss a possible end to their terrible war after Putin signaled his willingness to talk to Trump.   

Here at home, Trump’s win has not only spurred a significant stock market rally, it also boosted consumer confidence and business confidence. The National Federation of Small Business Optimism Index jumped last month to its highest level since June 2021, boding well for spending and investment.  

Trump comes into office this time around knowing how the swamp works; he is ready, and so are the people he is nominating to join him in shaking things up. Education, our military, the U.S. healthcare system — he has big plans to reform them all. 

Biden’s ambition was to be an historic president; as Time reported in 2020, the then-candidate wrapped himself in FDR’s mantle. FDR is the only person ever named Person of the Year three times. Maybe it will be Trump, not Biden, who next earns that remarkable accolade.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/5037806-time-magazine-trump-person-of-year

Published in The Hill

Trump just outfoxed Biden and his corrupt family. Again Biden’s drone stonewalling finally fulfills president’s campaign promise

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

6 hours ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
I am alternately peeved and sympathetic with Chip Roy, Ralph Norman and the others who torpedoed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But after reading the fine print this morning and realizing that reforms to Medicaid don’t kick in until 2029 !!!! I am disgusted. I get that states need some time to adjust to a change in rules regarding Medicaid eligibility – maybe a year or 18 months — but do they really need four years? No, they do not. The extended timeframe is an obvious play to put political repercussions off until after the midterms. Legislators from swing districts fear losing their seats because able-bodied adults lose their free ride. They want to put off any change as long as possible.
On the other hand, those vulnerable legislators will almost certainly get canned if the 2017 tax cuts don’t get extended and Trump’s agenda crashes. We need both to get the bill passed, and to make it tougher.
The conservatives calling for bigger spending cuts are completely correct. Just ask Moody’s, which in recent days downgraded U.S. debt. Imagine, the United States of America has lost its triple-A status. (The other two major ratings agencies had already made this downgrade.) This would be a wake-up call except that most of our country is asleep, lulled into a false sense of complacency by hours spent on Tik-Tok or watching the NFL. We all need downtime, for sure, but we also need to pay attention to what’s happening with our country’s fiscal outlook. It isn’t good. Even the Fed, no friend to the Trump administration or to fiscal austerity, has announced it will cut staff and overhead. Of course, why the Fed has a headcount of 24,000 is a mystery. How can they employ so many people and still get it wrong most of the time? This is the group that never spoke out against Biden’s reckless spending; it’s quite the switch.
Simply put, the country endorsed a huge surge in government spending to compensate for the wrong-headed directives during Covid that shut down schools, businesses and churches. The government under Trump wanted to keep Americans employed and the economy ready to rebound, which it did. Biden kept the spending at max level, refusing to let a crisis go to waste. Democrats in Congress and the Fed went along, spurring the highest inflation in decades.
Now we have to go back to the trend-line pre-Covid spending; the bill on the table doesn’t do that. Republicans must do better if they want to keep the majority.
… See MoreSee Less

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 25
  • Shares: 3
  • Comments: 7

Comment on Facebook

Right on, as usual! Thanks for all your clear-headed messages.

We need a balanced budget amendment! Deficit spending needs to end!

Liz Peek Well written, my friend!

Nailed it

Just sick of BOTH parties. Neither are there for the Working Americans. BOTH parties responsible for the theft going on. Repubs should have read the bills that gave away money..

Convention of States is looking better everyday.

Honestly you should be somewhere in Trumps administration Liz.. Just sayin

View more comments

Liz Peek

1 day ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

3 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies