Liz Peek
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
Trump’s closing argument: It doesn’t have to be this way   
October 18, 2024

Trump’s closing argument: It doesn’t have to be this way   

Liz Peek Articles

When Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) rebuked Martha Raddatz on air a few days ago, he was not just pointing out the bias of the liberal media. The GOP vice presidential candidate was also calling out a far more sinister threat to our country.  

In a conversation about the violent criminals of Tren del Aragua entering our country illegally, ABC host Raddatz sought to minimize reports that the feared Venezuelan gang had taken over housing units in Aurora, Colo. “The incidents were limited to a handful of apartment complexes,” she claimed — as though that were somehow acceptable.  

But Vance was having none of it. “Martha, do you hear yourself?” the senator prodded, rightly astonished at her attitude.

What he spotlighted is how the media, and Americans generally, are beginning to normalize our open border, rising crime and other heinous activities that would never have been tolerated in the past and should not be tolerated now. 

We now accept that millions of people have been allowed to enter the country illegally, and that even though some commit serious crimes, many times they are allowed to stay. The toxic combination of sanctuary city, “raise the age” laws and “criminal justice reform” has made it almost impossible to lock up or deport criminals, putting increasing numbers of Americans in harm’s way. 

Just recently, in New York City, a 15-year-old Venezuelan migrant who is being housed at a “taxpayer-funded hotel” has allegedly committed what the New York Post calls a “one-man crime spree of assaults and thefts.”Notwithstanding a lengthening crime sheet totaling 11 purported robberies and thefts — including one with a deadly weapon — the juvenile has been cut loose after every alleged crime. He belongs to a pack of violent young thugs robbing tourists and New Yorkers alike, often at gunpoint, none of whom has been thrown in jail.

This is outrageous. But such reports have become so commonplace they barely quicken the pulse of weary city-dwellers. Nonetheless, people increasingly fear for their personal safety — and are also convinced that no one is riding to their rescue.  

It is not just undocumented migrants who are wreaking havoc in our cities and in our country. Lawlessness in general has surged, driving down the quality of life and harming businesses.

Walgreens announced in recent days that it would be closing 1,200 stores. This comes on top of CVS and Rite-Aid similarly pruning back their brick-and-mortar presence. In the past, before crime was such a hot-button issue, CEOs declared out-of-control retail theft as contributing to their firms’ poor performances. Now they are wary of blow-back for calling out the costly “shrinkage” they endure, especially in cities. 

Walgreens announced in 2021 it was shuttering stores in San Francisco, citing rampant shoplifting as driving the closures. As the New York Times reported, “In June 2021, a video of someone shoplifting from a San Francisco Walgreens on his bicycle and, with a garbage bag filled with stolen merchandise, riding past a television news reporter and security guard, drew millions of views.”

Those scenes play out daily in our big cities — just ask anyone working in those stores — but it is now politically incorrect to bring it up.

When stores must protect their everyday goods behind plastic shields, requiring customers to wait for help, costs go up and volumes plummet. It is far easier to order what you need on Amazon. 

Voters rate crime as one of their top concerns. During the debate a month ago between the two presidential candidates, the ABC anchor who co-moderated the face-off memorably weighed in to fact-check Donald Trump on the subject. The former president had said that crime in the U.S. under the Biden-Harris administration was “through the roof.” David Muir stepped in to correct the record, saying “President Trump, as you know, the FBI says that overall violent crime is actually coming down in this country.” The GOP candidate called the FBI data “defrauding statements,” meaning “false.”  

And now it turns out Trump was right.    

Although the FBI stats initially showed that crime had gone down 2.1 percent in 2022, the agency has revised the data to show the number of violent misdeeds has actually increased by 80,029, or 4.5 percent. The FBI added to the tally an additional 1,699 murders, 7,780 rapes, 33,459 robberies and 37,091 aggravated assaults that year. That was awkward for the Biden-Harris White House, which had taken a premature victory lap for driving crime to a “near 50-year low.” 

But no one actually needed the FBI to tell us what we all know from our daily experience. If crime stats in New York are down, it is probably because people have given up reporting assaults and thefts, knowing that the police are reluctant to respond. Cops will tell victims that their “hands are tied.” Eventually, people give up.  

As a result, many think that the Department of Justice’s National Crime Victimization Survey, which showed increases in rape, aggravated assault and robbery from 2020 to 2023, has become the more reliable barometer of wrongdoing. According to the report, the total number of violent crimes in 2023 was 6.4 million, up from 5.8 million in 2019. That is an increase greater than 10 percent, so it’s no surprise people notice.

Democrats want us to believe that the border is under control, that crime is down and that the economy is excellent. None of that is true, and the voters know it. When 79 percent of registered voters say the country is on the “wrong track,” as respondents did in a recent Marquette Law School poll, the incumbent party should worry. 

The risk is that far too many Americans may be like Raddatz — normalizing and becoming inured to our country’s big problems. Trump’s closing argument in the days ahead should be that it does not have to be this way and that he will turn things around. He has, after all, done it before. 

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4938760-trump-vance-crime-normalization

Published in The Hill

3 reasons why Kamala Harris still can’t define her vision Three reasons why Trump’s plan to indict Harris over illegal immigration is the right call

Related Posts

Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AM

Articles

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Articles

Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Articles

Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda

Recent Posts

  • Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 8.43.36 AMDOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment
  • Democrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliensDemocrats’ bizarre affection for illegal aliens
  • Republicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agendaRepublicans need to grow a spine and support Trump’s agenda
  • Screenshot 2019-06-26 07.54.58What Kamala Harris buzz is telling us. Read between the lines, America

Tweets by Liz

Unable to load Tweets

Follow

Liz on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Liz Peek

12 hours ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
I am alternately peeved and sympathetic with Chip Roy, Ralph Norman and the others who torpedoed Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But after reading the fine print this morning and realizing that reforms to Medicaid don’t kick in until 2029 !!!! I am disgusted. I get that states need some time to adjust to a change in rules regarding Medicaid eligibility – maybe a year or 18 months — but do they really need four years? No, they do not. The extended timeframe is an obvious play to put political repercussions off until after the midterms. Legislators from swing districts fear losing their seats because able-bodied adults lose their free ride. They want to put off any change as long as possible.
On the other hand, those vulnerable legislators will almost certainly get canned if the 2017 tax cuts don’t get extended and Trump’s agenda crashes. We need both to get the bill passed, and to make it tougher.
The conservatives calling for bigger spending cuts are completely correct. Just ask Moody’s, which in recent days downgraded U.S. debt. Imagine, the United States of America has lost its triple-A status. (The other two major ratings agencies had already made this downgrade.) This would be a wake-up call except that most of our country is asleep, lulled into a false sense of complacency by hours spent on Tik-Tok or watching the NFL. We all need downtime, for sure, but we also need to pay attention to what’s happening with our country’s fiscal outlook. It isn’t good. Even the Fed, no friend to the Trump administration or to fiscal austerity, has announced it will cut staff and overhead. Of course, why the Fed has a headcount of 24,000 is a mystery. How can they employ so many people and still get it wrong most of the time? This is the group that never spoke out against Biden’s reckless spending; it’s quite the switch.
Simply put, the country endorsed a huge surge in government spending to compensate for the wrong-headed directives during Covid that shut down schools, businesses and churches. The government under Trump wanted to keep Americans employed and the economy ready to rebound, which it did. Biden kept the spending at max level, refusing to let a crisis go to waste. Democrats in Congress and the Fed went along, spurring the highest inflation in decades.
Now we have to go back to the trend-line pre-Covid spending; the bill on the table doesn’t do that. Republicans must do better if they want to keep the majority.
… See MoreSee Less

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 30
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 9

Comment on Facebook

Right on, as usual! Thanks for all your clear-headed messages.

We need a balanced budget amendment! Deficit spending needs to end!

Just sick of BOTH parties. Neither are there for the Working Americans. BOTH parties responsible for the theft going on. Repubs should have read the bills that gave away money..

Nailed it

Liz Peek Well written, my friend!

Convention of States is looking better everyday.

Honestly you should be somewhere in Trumps administration Liz.. Just sayin

Is TERM LIMiTS in this big beautiful bill? Everything else is.
If not, why not?
Past time to cut the deadwood and get “servants” of We the People seated who will do the job more responsibly..

Following.

View more comments

Liz Peek

2 days ago

Liz Peek

What happened to DOGE???
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

DOGE isn’t meeting its goals — you can thank the political establishment

DOGE chief has been thwarted at every turn — by judges, Democrats and their media allies, even Republicans.

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

The Uniparty doesn't want their gravy train turned over.

Democrats are Americas virus.

Liz Peek

3 days ago

Liz Peek

My Morning Rant:
John Hawley, Senator from Missouri, is out with a blistering attack on Republicans in Congress who want to “cut” Medicaid spending. He declares those in favor of Medicaid reforms contained in the House bill “a noisy contingent of corporatist Republicans — call it the party’s Wall Street wing” who are not on board with working-class Americans and who want to “build our big, beautiful bill around slashing health insurance for the working poor”. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/opinion/josh-hawley-dont-cut-medicaid.html
What rot. Working Americans of all classes are sick and tired of an ever-growing amount of their hard-earned taxes going to fund those who are not working. This is not a Wall Street issue- it’s a fairness issue. Though some groups say most Medicaid recipients are working, that is not true. A study by AEI showed that “In December 2022, 44 percent of non-disabled working age Medicaid recipients without children worked at least 80 hours” per month, compared to 72% not receiving Medicaid. Focusing on “prime working ages of 25 to 54, the share working at least 80 hours was 51 percent among Medicaid recipients and 84 percent among non-Medicaid recipients.” So why would 49% not be working?
Here’s the problem: the Medicaid changes that GOP legislators want to make don’t target “the working poor”, they target able-bodied men and women who are not working, and who historically would not have qualified for Medicaid benefits. Only when Obama rescinded the work requirements for Medicaid did the program blow up entirely and become the drain on the fiscal purse that we see today. As he states in his op-ed, Hawley’s problem is this: “Today [Medicaid] serves over 70 million Americans, including well over one million residents of Missouri, the state I represent.” Hawley, who was elected last fall by a 14-point margin, fears he’ll lose ground with those million recipients if he embraces fiscal common sense. Or maybe he fears losing the support of healthcare professionals, who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign. www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/josh-hawley/summary?cid=N00041620
Our country has seen a long-term decline in able-bodied men working. The labor participation rate for that group is 89.1% which sounds high until you realize that it was 97.1% in 1960. That’s a huge slide, with troubling implications for U.S. productivity. If you believe, as I do, that work is healthy, it is also bad news for the individuals who are, at least in some cases, gaming the system.
Instead of railing about sincere efforts to reform an out-of-control entitlement, why doesn’t Hawley turn his attentions to improving job opportunities and training in his state? Or attracting more employers? And, where are his ideas for cutting federal spending, which is too high and which is hurting our nation? Some $50 billion in Medicaid outlays funds fraud or constitutes “improper payments.” What is Hawley doing to confront that?
Maybe I would be more impressed with his arguments but for his having published his screed in the New York Times- is that the most efficient way to speak to working-class Americans? Bernie Sanders probably thinks so, and so does Josh Hawley.
… See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Sen. Josh Hawley – Campaign Finance Summary

Fundraising profile for Sen. Josh Hawley – Missouri

Share

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linked InShare by Email

  • Likes: 4
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 2

Comment on Facebook

We have to end the idea that working for McDonalds at the counter is the end game career wise. It’s what you do in high school and college to pay your bills. If you want to be in that industry, you need to think manager then owner as that is the career.

Uniparty in action. They are there to Take money, not help The People.

LOAD MORE

Tags

AGENDA AIR FORCE BIG GOVERNMENT BORDER WALL CHINA CLINTON CONGRESS CYBERWAR DEMOCRATS DRAIN THE SWAMP E-VERIFY ECONOMY ELON MUSK FILLIBUSTER FREEDOM CAUCUS FREEDOM WATCH GOP GORSUCH GRADUATION HACKING HEALTH CARE HILLARY IMMIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURE KUSHNER MEDIA MIDDLE EAST MOODY'S NUNES NYC OIL RAND PAUL STOCK MARKET SUPREME COURT SUSAN RICE TAXES TAX REFORM TECHNOLOGY TED CRUZ TERROR TRUMP TURKEY WALL STREET WEATHER WELLESLEY
[themify_map address="233 78th Street New York, NY 10032" width=100% height=250px zoom=14]
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Radio
  • About
  • Contact
©2017 LizPeek.org. All Rights Reserved.
Site by Steeplechase Strategies